Saturday, 14 November 2009


Peter's book is out!!!


The Gramscian Moment. Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism

Peter D. Thomas








Publication year: 2009

Series: Historical Materialism Book Series, 24

ISBN-13 (i): 978 90 04 16771 1

ISBN-10: 90 04 16771 4

Cover: Hardback

Number of pages: xxv, 477 pp.

List price: € 115.00 / US$ 170.00


Antonio Gramsci's Prison Notebooks are today acknowledged as a classic
of the human and social sciences in the twentieth century. The
influence of his thought in numerous fields of scholarship is only
exceeded by the diverse interpretations and readings to which it has
been subjected, resulting in often contradictory 'images of Gramsci'.
This book draws on the rich recent season of Gramscian philological
studies in order to argue that the true significance of Gramsci's
thought consists in its distinctive position in the development of the
Marxist tradition. Providing a detailed reconsideration of Gramsci's
theory of the state and concept of philosophy, The Gramscian Moment
argues for the urgent necessity of taking up the challenge of
developing a 'philosophy of praxis' as a vital element in the
contemporary revitalisation of Marxism.



Peter D. Thomas (Ph.D, 2008) studied at the University of Queensland,
Freie Universität Berlin, L’Università “Federico II”, Naples, and the
Universiteit van Amsterdam. He has published widely on Marxist
political theory and philosophy. He is a member of the editorial board
of the journal Historical Materialism: research in critical Marxist
theory.




REVIEWS

Peter Thomas' book should become the standard text in English on
Gramsci's thought. Acquainted as he is with the latest wrinkle in the
Italian debate on Gramsci, Thomas combines an unmatched philological
research into the sources and a mastery of the ongoing debates about
the sense we should make of key ideas like hegemony. He deftly
overturns the received orthodoxy and the various abuses of the ideas
of the marxist militant by theorists of cultural studies, both
restoring Gramsci's work to its true status and opening up fruitful
possibilities for understanding his contribution to political theory
more generally. The best book on Gramsci's political theory for three
decades.

Alastair Davidson, Author of Antonio Gramsci. the Man, his Ideas and
Antonio Gramsci: Towards an Intellectual Biography



Peter Thomas's Gramsci is the one we need in an era of economic and
geopolitical crises that bears some resemblances to Gramsci's own
time. This Gramsci is no embarrassed culturalist, confused strategist,
or incipient post-Marxist. Thomas's Gramsci, developed from rigorous
critical study of the Prison Notebooks and of the now extensive
scholarly literature, is a deeply consequent thinker intent on
reconstructing revolutionary Marxism in opposition to the most
advanced bourgeois thought of his day. This is also a Gramsci for whom
political economy is of central methodological and substantive
significance. Not content with scholarly interpretation, Thomas draws
his Gramsci into dialogue with contemporary radical thought,
illuminating both sides of the conversation. This is a book that will
recast the understanding of Gramsci, especially but not exclusively in
the Anglophone world.

Alex Callinicos, Professor of European Studies, Social Theory and
International Political Economy, King's College, London



What superlatives can I use to describe this book? Terms like
‘outstanding,’ ‘superb’ and ‘tour-de-force’ suggest themselves, but
even these do not fully capture the extraordinary power of The
Gramscian Moment. Peter Thomas’s erudite, wide-ranging, and
staggeringly sophisticated reading of Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks
completely overturns the dominant interpretations including those of
Louis Althusser and Perry Anderson. Never again will we be able to
read Gramsci solely through their lenses. Henceforth, Thomas’s
magisterial exploration of Gramsci’s thought will become the critical
point of reference for all serious work in the field. But Thomas does
more than meticulous exegesis. He also insists on the actuality of
Gramsci’s work, urging that we approach it in the spirit of “both
continuation and transformation, fidelity and renewal.” He succeeds
brilliantly on all counts.

David McNally, Professor of Political Science, York University, Toronto



Peter Thomas's The Gramscian Moment demonstrates the extent to which
Gramsci’s thought represents a singular synthesis of virtually the
entire tradition of Western political thought. The richness of his
interpretative frameworks allows him both to integrate partial
approaches and contributions and to throw new light on the central
questions inherited by this tradition. This work succeeds in
presenting Gramsci as a "living classic", an author absolutely central
to our understanding of modernity. Given its scope, richness and
originality, I have no doubt that this work will represent a milestone
in Gramscian scholarship and an important contribution to contemporary
debates in political theory and philosophy.

Stathis Kouvelakis, Author of Philosophy and Revolution and Co-editor
of a Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism



The Gramscian Moment is the most thorough and illuminating
philosophical study of Gramsci yet to appear in English. It sets a new
standard for work not only on Gramsci himself but on the whole complex
of issues associated with his legacy – on the mechanics and dimensions
of hegemony, on the role and nature of the subject of political
action, on the relation between theory and practice, and between civil
society and the state. Thomas does more than any previous reader of
Gramsci to demonstrate how his philosophy can fairly claim to meet
Marx's famous prescription – not merely "to interpret the world but to
change it".

Peter Hallward, Professor of Modern European Philosophy, Middlesex
University, London

Tuesday, 10 November 2009


E' uscito il secondo numero dei Quaderni Viola!

C. Bonfiglioli, L. Cirillo, L. Corradi, B.D. Vivo, S. R. Farris, V. Perilli (a c. di), La Straniera: informazioni, sito-bibliografie e ragionamenti su razzismo e sessismo, Alegre, 2009



Habemus QV!!





Thursday, 17 September 2009

Conference: Encountering Althusser


Jan van Eyck Academy, Maastricht, 9-11 October 2009

International Conference organised by Katja Diefenbach, Sara Farris, Gal Kirn and Peter Thomas



The work of Louis Althusser and his associates constituted an important attempt to rethink the political and philosophical potential of Marx’s thought, in tension with its ‘orthodox’ reading in Stalinism. In his work in the 1960s and 1970s, Althusser proposed to negate the metaphysical categories of subject, substance, telos, and end. He further explored these themes in the late 1970s and 1980s in terms of the event, the encounter and contingency. The late Althusser’s “materialism of the encounter” both provides many points of contact for a productive dialogue with thinkers associated with post-structuralism, while at the same time seeming to maintain a stronger connection to the Marxist tradition, particularly in terms of his continuing affirmation of the dictatorship of the proletariat. One of the purposes of this conference will be to attempt to gain an overview of the development of Althusser’s thought and to pose the question of its legacy for contemporary debates in radical political thought.

It is not only the legacy of Louis Althusser that will be of our interest here, however, but rather how to encounter and deal with the more unrecognised or suppressed points in his thought that remain enigmatic, and at the same time productive for further research in politics, economy, philosophy (and ideology). Many contemporary discussions ranging from Badiou and Zizek to Balibar, Laclau and Butler revolve around some topics that were traced or started by Louis Althusser, mainly on ideology, linking Althusser to Lacan or politics. In this conference, we would like to focus on some points that have not yet been discussed or have not yet been given the attention they deserve.

In the Althusserian spirit of philosophy working by attacking established positions on an occupied Kampfplatz, we outline four different fields of investigation to which panels will be dedicated: ruptures in philosophy, politics, political economy and politics and philosophy in the late Althusser. In each field, we intend to subject established interpretations of Althusser’s thought to critique and to attempt to determine productive areas for future research. Beyond such scholarly and philological debates, however, our guiding concern will be to pose the question of the extent to which an encounter with Althusser today has the potential to promote critical energies and perspectives that are capable of intervening effectively in the contemporary conjuncture.


Friday 9|10 Ruptures in philosophy: dis/continuities in Althusser's thought – Chair: Peter Thomas

16:00 – 16:15 Introduction
16:15 – 17:15 G. Michael Goshgarian | The early "late Althusser"

Break

17:30 – 18:30 Caroline Williams | Althusser and Spinoza
18:30 – 19.30 Giorgos Fourtounis | The "absolute beginning" and its duration: the continuity of rupture in Althusser
19:30 Discussion

Saturday 10|10 The primacy of politics: singularity, dictatorship of proletariat, class struggle – Chair: Gal Kirn

10:00 – 10:15 Introduction
10:15 – 11:15 Rastko Močnik

Break

11:30 – 12:30 Ozren Pupovac | At this side of interpellation: Althusser’s critique of the subject
12:30 – 13:30 Slobodan Karamanić | Three uses of topography: theory, politics, state

Lunch

14:30 – 15:30 Mikko Lahtinen | Althusser, Machiavelli and us: from Marxist philosophy to materialist politics
15:30 – 16:00 Discussion

Break

The critique of political economy and the legacy of Louis Althusser – Chair: Sara Farris

16:30 - 16:45 Introduction
16:45 – 17:45 Maria Turchetto
17:45 – 18:45 Marko Kržan | Should there be a Marxian perspective on contemporary capitalism

Break

19:00 – 20:00 Frieder Otto Wolf | Dialectic and contingency in thinking reproduction: looking back at a line of Althusser’s theoretical initiatives
20:00 Discussion

Sunday 11|10 Politics and philosophy in the late Althusser: the philosophy of the encounter and aleatory materialism – Chair: Katja Diefenbach

10:00 – 10:15 Introduction
10:15 – 11.15 Vittorio Morfino | History as the "permanent revocation of the accomplished fact": on Machiavelli in the late Althusser.
11:15 – 12.15 Katja Kolšek | Some reflections on the conception of reading of Althusser's aleatory materialism

Break

12:45 – 13:45 Panagiotis Sotiris | Rethinking aleatory materialism
13:45 - 14:45 Jason Read | Primitive accumulation: between contingency and constitution
14.45 - 15:15 Discussion

Monday, 24 August 2009

I VERI COLPEVOLI

di Annamaria Rivera


Abbiamo provato a gridarlo in ogni modo che il mostruoso reato d'immigrazione clandestina avrebbe generato crimini «umanitari». Così è stato, purtroppo. L'abbandono e poi la morte dei settantatre profughi eritrei è la prima strage prodotta dal «pacchetto-sicurezza». È, certo, il frutto maturo del trattato con la Libia, siglato dal ministro Amato, rafforzato e reso operativo, cioè criminale, dall'attuale governo. È il frutto, più largamente, dell'Europa-fortezza e dell'adeguamento alla sua politica anche da parte del governo maltese.
Ma inedito è il cinismo di Stato per cui una tale strage non trovi come risposta né l'indignazione corale, né l'incriminazione per strage, appunto, bensì per favoreggiamento dell'immigrazione clandestina. «Senza escludere un'eventuale ipotesi di omissione di soccorso», dicono gli inquirenti. Immigrazione clandestina di cui potrebbero essere imputati i cinque poveri spettri che il fato - lui solo compassionevole - ha voluto sottrarre alla morte. Questo «dettaglio», con l'annuncio della parata che Berlusconi sta per fare il 30 agosto con Gheddafi per festeggiare a Tripoli l'anniversario del trattato, restituisce in modo perfetto il senso del crollo dell'elementarmente umano consumato con le politiche di questo governo.



Politiche disumane generano comportamenti disumani: se nessuno ha sentito il dovere morale di soccorrerli è anche perché leggi criminali producono condotte sociali criminali. Ma non tutto è inedito in questo dramma. Non è vero che con esso «abbiamo toccato il fondo», come si è scritto. Se così fosse, si potrebbe coltivare la fragile speranza che un futuro governo non reazionario e non razzista potrebbe ripristinare forme di rispetto per l'elementarmente umano. Purtroppo non è così. Ce lo dice la strage di 108 profughi albanesi della Kater I Rades, provocata nel 1997 dalla pretesa di un governo di centrosinistra di bloccare manu militari l'esodo albanese. Ce lo ricorda un'altra strage del proibizionismo, quella del 25 dicembre 1996, in cui annegarono 233 migranti: a lungo ignorata dai media - il manifesto fu l'unico giornale ad aprire subito con la tragedia -, sempre negata dal governo di centrosinistra e occultata da una parte dei pescatori di Portopalo. Alla fine fu grazie all'ostinazione di qualche giornalista e di antirazzisti come Dino Frisullo, che il silenzio fu spezzato. Non vogliamo sostenere che il trattamento crudele riservato ai de-umanizzati - coloro che anche da cadaveri sono detti clandestini - sia una lunga notte oscura in cui tutte le vacche sono nere. Ma che per produrre i frutti marci che coltiva il governo in carica, di fatto guidato dall'ideologia post-nazionalsocialista della Lega nord, altri hanno provveduto a spargere i semi avvelenati: quelli del proibizionismo crudele e ad ogni costo. La condizione per tornare a coltivare la speranza sta nella costruzione di una volontà collettiva di superamento del paradigma proibizionista.

da Il Manifesto, 23 Agosto 2009

Thursday, 30 July 2009

On Italian Marxisms by Peter Thomas in the last number of 'New Left Review'

As this blog happens to be particularly sensitive to the Anglo-Italian dialogue and to Marxist and leftist issues more in general, I recommend the reading of the first review essay on Italian Marxisms in the last number of New Left Review. The entire number is worth reading by the way!

New Left Review 58, July-August 2009

Kenneth Pomeranz: The Great Himalayan Watershed

From Asia’s mountainous heart flow rivers on which half the world’s population depends. Pomeranz examines the complex interaction between human water needs, fragile ecology and vast infrastructural projects—and the far-reaching consequences of their conjugation.

Miroslav Hroch: Learning from Small Nations

Leading scholar of national questions discusses his personal trajectory and theoretical development, against the backdrop of the Czech experience. Sociological and historical roots of national feeling, and comparative perspectives on their European destinies.

R. W. Johnson: False Start in South Africa

Disappointments of post-apartheid rule, marred by mass unemployment and corruption, amid the enrichment of a new black elite. Does the arrival of Zuma, and new salience of the SACP within the ruling alliance, portend a lurch to ethnic conflict and capital flight?

Patrick Bond: In Power in Pretoria?

Responding to Johnson, Patrick Bond locates the origins of the ANC’s neoliberal record since 1994 in the compromises of the transition era. Rhetoric versus reality, and the subordination of trade unions and SACP alike to capital’s prerogatives.

Etienne Balibar: Althusser and the Rue d'Ulm

Retrospective look at the life and work of Althusser, seen within the structures—personal, political, institutional—of the École Normale Supérieure. Teaching, thinking and writing at the intersection of private and public realms.

Fredric Jameson: Marx and Montage

The author of Archaeologies of the Future unearths fragments from ‘ideological antiquity’ in Alexander Kluge’s recent film on Capital. Encounters with Eisenstein’s unrealized equivalent, seeking a cinematic transposition of the commodity fetish.


BOOK REVIEWS


Peter Thomas on Cristina Corradi, Storia dei marxismi in Italia. Multiple inheritances of Labriola, Gramsci, operaismo and other currents. Can a pluralized theoretical tradition aspire to outrun reverses in praxis?.

Tony Wood on Michael Reid, Forgotten Continent: The Battle for Latin America’s Soul. A revised neoliberal gospel for the region, courtesy of the Economist.

Max Gasner on Robert Kagan, The Return of History and the End of Dreams. The 21st century as re-run of the 19th, shaped by the ambitions of ascendant autocratic powers.


Friday, 17 July 2009

For f...'s sake. Leave us alone! Part II



This is one example of the new marketing strategy that the University Alma Mater of Bologna (Italy) has chosen in order to attract more students. I am still collecting some materials. More soon!




Tuesday, 14 July 2009


Rethinking Marxism Conference
University of Massachusetts Amherst



Call for Papers

New Marxian Times will be held over four days, beginning on Thursday evening, 5 November 2009 and ending on Sunday afternoon, 8 November 2009. In addition to two plenary sessions and an art exhibition, there will be concurrent panels, workshops, and art/cultural events. We invite the submission of organized sessions that follow traditional or non-traditional formats (such as workshops, roundtables, and dialogue among and between presenters and audience) as well as individual presentations. Since Marxism covers a wide variety of fields, from literature to public health and forms of political practice, from environmental organizing to opposing global inequality and envisioning new economic and social practice, anyone engaging with Marxism in any discipline or form of activism is encouraged to submit paper and panel proposals. We encourage those working in areas that intersect with Marxism, such as critical race theory, feminism, political economy, anarchist studies, cultural and literary studies, queer theory, working-class and labor studies, postcolonial studies, geography and urban studies, psychoanalysis, social and natural sciences, philosophy, and around issues of class, race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexuality, and disability, to submit proposals. We also welcome video, poetry, performance, and all other modes of presentation and cultural expression.

SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

Proposals for papers, films, or other formats should include:

  • Paper title
  • Presenter's name and contact information (mail, email, phone, affiliations)
  • Brief abstract (no more than 200 words)
  • Technology needs for presentation


Proposals for panels should include:

  • Panel title
  • Name, contact information, and paper title for each presenter
  • Brief abstract (no more than 200 words) explaining the panel's focus
  • Brief abstract for each paper (no more than 200 words)
  • Names and contact information for any discussant(s) or respondent(s)
  • Technology needs of presenters
  • Title, contact, and address for any sponsoring organization or journal


The appropriate preregistration fee must accompany all proposal submissions. Unfortunately, any proposal not accompanied by the appropriate preregistration fee cannot be considered. Proposals that are not accepted will have their preregistration fees returned in full. If you are submitting a proposal for an entire panel, please make sure you include the preregistration fee for all members of the panel.

The deadline for proposal submission is 1 August 2009.